Table 1 contains the BIC and G 2 values, and the main coefficients of interest, namely those estimates from Models 1 and 2 involving Whites, Japanese, or Japanese Americans only. All BIC values were much less than 0, which indicated that both models fit better than the saturated model and the basic model with ? r , ? R , and ? rR . The improvement in fit highlights the substantial role that compositional and educational pairing patterns play in explaining the racial and ethnic pairing patterns. For the prewar cohort, Model 1 fit better than Model 2, but for the resettlement cohort, as expected, Model 2 fit better than Model 1. This result suggests that a major gender asymmetry entered the racial pairing patterns of the Japanese or Japanese Us citizens and you will Whites after World War II. eleven) from the design matrix of Model 2, the BIC value increased (not shown). This result indicates that veteran-husband and Japanese-war-bride intermarriages were only partly responsible for the emergence of the gender asymmetry in the level of intermarriage after World War II.
Table 1
Note: SE = fundamental mistake. Coefficient rates to own pairings of most other fraction racial teams (Blacks, Latinos, and other Asians) and other quotes come on article writers to the demand.
…